Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

US Tax Disputes

Keeping an eye on US tax controversy and litigation developments.

open menu close menu

US Tax Disputes

  • Home
  • About us
  • Property Tax
  • State and Local (Subnational) Taxation

Employee Retention Credit (ERC) Moratorium and Amnesty Program: What You Need to Know

By Gregory Rhodes, Michelle Levin, Ronald Levitt, Mark A. Loyd, Logan Abernathy, Sidney Jackson, and Kristin Martin Centeno
November 20, 2023
  • General
  • IRS
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The employee retention credit, or “ERC,” was introduced in 2020 as a part of the CARES Act to encourage businesses to keep workers on the payroll in 2020 and 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. For eligible businesses, the ERC provides payroll tax credits for wages and health insurance paid to employees during those difficult years. The ERC program ended with the enactment of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in November 2021, but businesses can still claim ERC credits retroactively for a period of three years. 

Since the time the ERC was introduced, the IRS has issued ad hoc guidance on the program, which has not been vetted by the public or the courts. In recent weeks, the IRS decided to issue a moratorium on ERC payments and put into place a limited amnesty program for certain participants to unwind what the IRS perceives to be abusive claims. The IRS’s changing parameters for a program Congress created to help struggling businesses has put many well-intentioned taxpayers in a difficult position of either being unable to obtain their credits or left wondering whether they should withdraw the claims altogether. 

The Moratorium

The ERC provided a valuable tool to businesses and employees. However, in a September 14 news release, IR-2023-169, the IRS announced an immediate moratorium on retroactive ERC claims. ERC claims filed after September 14, 2023, will not be processed before the end of the year, and claims filed before then will be under “enhanced scrutiny,” with the standard processing goal of 90 days being increased to 180 days. This moratorium comes in response to a flood of what the IRS believes to be ineligible claims resulting from aggressive marketing and promotion of the credits.

The Amnesty Program and Process

In the moratorium announcement, IRS officials stated that there would be an opportunity for taxpayers to withdraw ERC claims that have not yet been processed. In an October 19 news release, IR-2023-193, the IRS provided more details on the withdrawal process and provided links to new resources to assist employers and tax professionals through the process. These resources include an interactive eligibility checklist and answers to frequently asked questions.

The new withdrawal option allows employers who filed ERC claims that have not yet been processed to withdraw their claims, avoiding possible repayment, interest, and penalties. The October 19 news release provides the four requirements for employers who wish to withdraw their ERC claims through this new process:

  1. The employer made the claim on an amended employment tax return.
  2. The employer filed the amended return only to claim the ERC, and no other adjustments were made.
  3. The employer requests the withdrawal of the entire ERC claim.
  4. The employer has not yet received a refund from their ERC claim, or the employer has not cashed or deposited the check if they were issued a refund.

Employers withdrawing an ERC claim should be careful to follow the strict procedural requirements for withdrawals. These procedures differ depending on if the employer has received a refund, if a refund check has been cashed or deposited, or if the employer has been notified that their claim is under audit. After an employer submits their withdrawal request, the IRS will respond with a letter accepting or rejecting it.

Because IRS informal notices are the only source of guidance on this Congressional authorized program, it is difficult to discern whether the limitations imposed by the IRS are overly restrictive. Employers considering withdrawal of the ERC claims should consult with their tax advisors and determine whether withdrawal is right for them. Given the ambiguities associated with ERC claims and eligibility, the analysis of whether, when, and how to file a withdrawal of an ERC claim could involve a complex analysis.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Gregory Rhodes

About Gregory Rhodes

Gregory Rhodes is a shareholder in Dentons Sirote’s Birmingham office, where he is a member of the Tax practice group and leads the Dentons Sirote Tax Controversy team. In his practice, Greg focuses on complex tax controversy and tax litigation work. He has successfully represented professional athletes, partnerships, corporations, and individuals as a first-chair trial attorney in high-stakes federal and local tax litigation throughout the country. Greg has also successfully handled complex tax cases in various United States Circuit Courts of Appeals. In addition, Greg is a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel and is ranked in Chambers USA in Band 1 in Tax in Alabama.

All posts Full bio

Michelle Levin

About Michelle Levin

Michelle Abroms Levin is a shareholder in Dentons Sirote’s Huntsville office, where she is a member of the Tax practice group. She represents clients during all phases of federal income tax controversies, including IRS audit, administrative appeals, and court proceedings in the U.S. Tax Court, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, federal district court and the Courts of Appeals. Michelle has secured major victories for her clients in the Eleventh Circuit, Fifth Circuit, and Tax Court, elevating important Administrative Procedure Act issues in the tax controversy context. Her experience includes a wide range of complex tax issues. Michelle also counsels clients in tax and business planning. She works with clients to structure transactions in a manner that maximizes tax benefits, reduces risk, and complies with tax law at local, state, and federal levels. Michelle has also been elected as a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel.

All posts Full bio

Ronald Levitt

About Ronald Levitt

Ronald Levitt is a shareholder in Dentons Sirote’s Birmingham, Alabama office, where he is a member of the Tax practice group and leads the Dentons Sirote Conservation Easement team. His practice focuses on federal and state controversy matters, including planning and defending conservation easements.

All posts Full bio

Mark A. Loyd

About Mark A. Loyd

Mark A. Loyd, co-leader of Dentons' national Tax practice group, has decades of experience successfully resolving his clients’ state, local and federal tax issues. Elected as a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel, a distinction reserved for America’s very best tax attorneys, Mark is also Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ Rated, the highest rating available, and has been selected as a Super Lawyer since 2015. Leveraging his extensive career in industry and CPA background, Mark has averted, managed and resolved sales, property, income and excise tax and licensing issues through audit management, administrative protest or settlement, and when necessary, through tax litigation in administrative tribunals, state courts and appellate courts, including the US Supreme Court. He’s licensed to practice in Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, federal district and appellate courts as well as the US Court of International Trade.

All posts Full bio

Logan Abernathy

About Logan Abernathy

Logan Chaney Abernathy is a Senior Managing Associate in Dentons Sirote’s Huntsville, Alabama office. She is a member of the Tax practice group. Logan’s practice focuses on tax controversy, tax litigation, and government investigations.

All posts Full bio

Sidney Jackson

About Sidney Jackson

Sidney W. Jackson, IV, is a Senior Managing Associate in Dentons Sirote’s Birmingham, Alabama office. He is a member of the Tax Controversy practice group, where his practice focuses on all phases of federal and state tax controversies, including IRS audit, administrative appeals, and court proceedings in the U.S. Tax Court, federal district court, and state tax tribunals.

All posts Full bio

Kristin Martin Centeno

About Kristin Martin Centeno

Kristin Martin Centeno is a senior managing associate in Dentons Sirote’s Birmingham, Alabama office. She is a member of the Tax practice group and focuses on tax controversy and tax litigation.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • IRS
  • IRS Administration
  • Partnerships/TEFRA

Substantial Changes to Partnership Tax Audit Procedures will Severely Impact Partner Liability and Rights Before the IRS

By Jeff Erney
  • General
  • State and Local Taxation

Kentucky: Century Aluminum Decision Provides Clarity on the Kentucky Manufacturing Sales Tax Exemption

By Mark A. Loyd, Bailey Roese, Stephanie Bruns, and Collier Clay
  • General
  • IRS

Act Fast to Qualify for IRS Penalty Relief

By Mark A. Loyd, Bailey Roese, and Stephanie Bruns

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Additional resources

Visit our Global tax guide to doing business in... 2024.

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site