Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

US Tax Disputes

Keeping an eye on US tax controversy and litigation developments.

open menu close menu

US Tax Disputes

  • Home
  • About us
  • State and Local (Subnational) Taxation

Indiana Super Heroes Must Pay . . . Property Tax

By Mark A. Loyd, Jeffrey T. Bennett, Bradley Hasler, Bailey Roese, and Stephanie Bruns
June 10, 2022
  • General
  • State and Local Taxation
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In a recent decision, Hall of Heroes Super Hero Museum, Inc. v. Elkhart County Assessor (Ind. Bd. of Tax Rev. January 7, 2022), the Indiana Board of Tax Review (“Indiana Board”) denied a museum’s 2020 claim for property tax exemption for education and/or charitable purposes.  The Hall of Heroes Super Hero Museum, Inc. (the “Museum”) is dedicated to preserving the 80-year history of superheroes in comics, toys, art, film and animation.  The Museum is a not-for-profit corporation, and although it did charge admission fees, it also provided free passes to libraries, schools and local charities. It also conducted educational programs and promoted literacy by supporting a summer reading program, and many of such programs were either free or offered at reduced fees.

The evidence indicated that the Museum did not provide classes on a weekly basis, and it was estimated that classes were only taught during approximately 25% of the time that the museum was open during 2019 and 2020. 

All or part of a building is exempt if it is owned, and exclusively or predominantly used or occupied for educational, literacy, scientific, religious or charitable purposes.  IC 6-1.1-10-16(a) and IC 6-1.1-10-36.3(c).  Property is predominantly used for a stated purpose if it is used for such purpose more than 50% of the time that it is used in the year that ends on the assessment date.  IC 6-1.1-10-36.3.  Where a property is not exclusively used for an exempt purpose, the taxpayer must offer evidence comparing the relative distribution of time between the exempt and non-exempt purposes.  (Citation omitted). 

The evidence showed that the Museum did not hold any classes during 2019, and held classes only approximately 25% of the time through 2020.  The Indiana Board therefore concluded that the Museum did not predominantly use the museum for educational purposes during the time in question. Thus, it did not qualify for the educational exemption.

The Museum also claimed an exemption for charitable purposes, which requires evidence of relief of human want, manifested by obvious charitable acts, as well as an expectation that sufficient benefit will inure to the public from such use as to justify the loss of tax revenue. (Citation omitted).  In support of its claim, the Museum pointed to McClain Museum, Inc., vs. Madison County Ass’r., 134 N.E.3rd 1096 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2019) in which a museum devoted to honoring America’s military history was found to justify such an exemption. 

However, the Indiana Board found that the Museum’s case was more akin to recreational and hobby activities, and as such was not shown to qualify for a charitable use exemption. 

The Indiana Board thus found the Museum’s property to be 100% taxable for property tax purposes.

This case shows that nonprofit status alone may not be enough to qualify for a property tax exemption; in many states, including Indiana, not-for-profit organizations are not guaranteed an exemption from property tax. Consider getting assistance in analyzing the relevant facts and circumstances that may be necessary to secure an exemption in Indiana.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Mark A. Loyd

About Mark A. Loyd

Mark A. Loyd, co-leader of Dentons' national Tax practice group, has decades of experience successfully resolving his clients’ state, local and federal tax issues. Elected as a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel, a distinction reserved for America’s very best tax attorneys, Mark is also Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ Rated, the highest rating available, and has been selected as a Super Lawyer since 2015. Leveraging his extensive career in industry and CPA background, Mark has averted, managed and resolved sales, property, income and excise tax and licensing issues through audit management, administrative protest or settlement, and when necessary, through tax litigation in administrative tribunals, state courts and appellate courts, including the US Supreme Court. He’s licensed to practice in Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, federal district and appellate courts as well as the US Court of International Trade.

All posts Full bio

Jeffrey T. Bennett

About Jeffrey T. Bennett

For more than 30 years, Jeff has represented industrial, manufacturing and commercial property taxpayers in administrative and appellate litigation, including assessment appeals, valuation issues, audit defense, equalization and compliance cases. Areas of concentration in Jeff's practice include utility company property and energy sector assessment and taxation, representing industries such as petroleum refining, petro-chemical, pipeline and wind and solar energy company assessment and taxation. Jeff also regularly handles state and local tax incentive matters, including negotiations, claims and compliance issues for clients with economic development projects.

All posts Full bio

Bradley Hasler

About Bradley Hasler

Brad Hasler is a member of Dentons’ Tax practice, assisting clients with real and personal property taxation, including assessment (ad valorem) appeals, requests for tax exemption, defending audits and defending tax sale proceedings. He also represents clients in general commercial litigation in state and federal courts.

All posts Full bio

Bailey Roese

About Bailey Roese

Bailey Roese is a partner in the Firm's Louisville office and represents taxpayers in federal, state, and local tax controversies. Selected as a Kentucky Super Lawyers® Rising Star for 2018 and 2019 in the area of Tax law, Bailey regularly advocates for clients in the state courts and administrative tribunals of Kentucky, Ohio and Indiana, as well as the United States Tax Court.

All posts Full bio

Stephanie Bruns

About Stephanie Bruns

Stephanie's practice includes state and local tax planning and income, sales, and excise tax, as well as property tax and tax controversy. Stephanie also assists with federal tax planning, business formation issues, and captive controversy.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • General
  • IRS

Act Fast to Qualify for IRS Penalty Relief

By Mark A. Loyd, Bailey Roese, and Stephanie Bruns
  • General

IRS concession hands taxpayers a major win in microcaptive insurance case, but leaves uncertainty on how the Tax Court will address 831(b) microcaptive insurance arrangements

By Michelle Levin and Sarah Green
  • Litigation
  • State and Local Taxation

A Split U.S. Supreme Court Abandoned 50 Years of Precedent and Holds States Can Tax Internet Companies

By Jeff Erney

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Additional resources

Visit our Global tax guide to doing business in... 2022.

global tax guide 2022
Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site